Nevertheless IMR 4831 and H4831SC are various powders, you will find that in lots of scenarios, exactly where one of these is mentioned the other will likely be likewise. Also, you will discover there is a fairly dependable relationship among them with reference to stated loads.
H4831SC Powder available in stock now. Ballistically, this Extraordinary Extruded powder is the precise copy of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain dimension, thus, the designation SC or small Reduce. The shorter, far more compact kernels enable the powder to flow through the powder steps more smoothly, helping to reduce the continual reducing of granules.
Liberalism; The extremely hard nonetheless approved notion that it's entirely probable to choose up a turd by the thoroughly clean close.
243, and many of the loads I have begun with encompass, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am likely to shoot the IMR7828 loads initial, accompanied by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises in the event the H-4831sc loads clearly show a shotgun sample! Who is aware of, I just may look for a use for it In fact.
Thornton, CO Offer of H4831SC is beginning to dwindle down much too so get what you need for the new load I'd propose. May be all of almost nothing should they restock all the things Soon but All those powders are owning transportation regulation issues.
Considering that there doesn't seem like any "official" Load Data around for this Load, can some of you offer a place to begin with h4831sc this mix and matters to think about when Performing this Load up?
I have used both and applied the exact same rates and also have not been in a position to tell any noticable differences with overall performance. the SC version h4831 vs h4831sc meters slightly smoother is about all. any feedback??
and you might want to invest in some new load data publications. powder composition and chemistry can does modify through the years. 4831 powder of decades back isn't really very same as exactly what is now available. which is why someone serious about reloading securely could have quite possibly the most current load data books to refer to.
The primary reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to take advantage of the temperature insensitivity of a Hodgdon Intense powder.
Liberalism; The not possible nevertheless accepted Idea that it's totally attainable to pick up a turd because of the thoroughly clean close.
Kansas Metropolis, MO I would seize whatsoever is offered at this time. I’ve used both equally even though with my go to load and didn’t h4831sc see nearly anything different general performance smart.
It is possible that no additional discussion is required, during which situation we advocate starting a brand new thread. If nonetheless you're feeling your response is required you are able to nonetheless achieve this.
Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but had far better pace and accuracy with H1000. I might rather use a slower burning powder with 215g tablets.
This looks as if a good location to disclose a bit more info on Hodgdon, H4831 specially...I as soon as had a pound of H4831SC sit around the shelf for several decades. It was ordered before Hodgdon started publicizing the "Extraordinary" line of powders, of which the H4831s are a part.